|
|
|
Practice-Based
Learning and Improvement
Definition and Goals
Throughout a professional’s career, new knowledge or treatments are developed and recognized as efficacious. A professional also often encounters clinical problems with which he or she has limited experience. These situations require a willingness to develop new knowledge and skills, recognition
of knowledge and skill gaps and an approach for continuously
evaluating and improving one’s knowledge and skills. Residents must review and critically assess the scientific literature to determine how quality of care can be improved in relation to one’s own practice. By the time of graduation, residents must be able to investigate, evaluate and improve their patient care practices.
Knowledge
The resident must demonstrate that his/her knowledge is inherently incomplete by:
- Ability to assess gaps in one’s knowledge base through participation in didactic seminars,
conferences and supervision
- Familiarity with the scope of recent scientific literature in child and adolescent
psychiatry and related fields
- Familiarity with research design and statistical methods, in order to be able to
evaluate the literature critically
Skills
The resident must continually monitor his or her knowledge base and its impact on clinical practice
by demonstrating:
- Ability to evaluate caseload and practice experience in a systematic manner.
This may include:
• the maintaining of patient logs
• the review of patient records and outcomes
• obtaining evaluations from patients (e.g., outcomes and patient satisfaction)
• obtaining appropriate supervision
• maintaining a system for examining errors in practice and initiating improvements
to eliminate or reduce errors
- Ability to locate, appraise and assimilate “best practices,” practice parameters and treatment
guidelines that are relevant to the care of childhood psychiatric disorders
- Ability to acquire and integrate information from a variety of sources, including:
• medical libraries
• use of information technology, including Internet-based searches and literature
databases (e.g., Medline)
• drug information databases
• scientific literature
• presentations and consultations from specialists
• attending conferences at scientific meetings
- Ability to read and evaluate the scientific literature critically and apply information from
scientific literature to current patient/clinical problems. The resident should be able to
assess the generality or applicability of research findings to one’s patients, in relation to
their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. This may include the following:
• using appropriate journals and knowledge for what are necessary parts of successful
research, review articles, consultations, teaching and clinical practice
• applying knowledge of common methodologies employed in psychiatric research to
evaluate studies, particularly in appraising diagnostic validity and/or therapeutic
effectiveness
• conducting and presenting reviews of current research in such formats as journal
clubs, didactic seminars, conferences and/or original publications
• researching and summarizing a particular problem that derives from the resident’s
caseload
• developing and pursuing effective remediation strategies for clinical practice that
are based on critical review of the scientific literature
Attitudes
The resident must demonstrate the following attitudes regarding practice-based learning and
improvement:
- Recognize the need for lifelong learning and monitoring of one’s own practice
- Be willing to pursue continuing education and supervised experiences to keep one’s own
practice commensurate with the community standard of care
- A willingness to obtain information from electronic databases and scientific literature in
child and adolescent psychiatry and related fields
- Be willing to remain abreast on scientific advances, new clinical approaches and investigations
of clinical outcomes
- Recognize that the scientific literature is constantly evolving, that no one report or idea is
necessarily true for all situations and that the literature should be critically judged for its
methodology and applicability
|
|